Archive for the ‘TV’ Category

Part II: The Wrath of Comcast

Thursday, October 9th, 2008

OK, so I did send email to “Rick” besides my last post, so I’m not sure which one triggered the intense interest of Comcast, but they’ve made sure to email and phone me to check on things. That’s sort of flattering, I guess, even if some of the messages were misguided.

Turns out I was misinformed by the (Canadian, apparently) after-hours call center. Channels 4 (WTTV) and 6 (WRTV) are not slated to move to the digital lineup anytime soon. That’s good to know, and the crux of my complaint. I hadn’t heard they were moving because they aren’t. Problem solved.

I am interested in digital cable in general, and specifically for HD, but even at $2 a month (an estimate one rep gave me) per cable box, it’s still a big outlay. Before I commit to that, I’ll look into the option of buying some compatible boxes from somewhere. I’ve heard they’re too expensive to be cost-effective, but it’s worth a look.

So it’s not as dire as I’d feared, which is good, but we have learned that if there is (as there was) a problem between here and Indy or at the local office, there’s no longer any immediate response expected. Under Insight, there were techs on call who would fix things (and I’ve seen that work in the past). Apparently that’s not the case now, and nothing’s likely to happen same-day. Fortunately, those problems don’t come up often. I’m a systems administrator myself- I know how that stuff works, and that people only notice when it doesn’t.

Also, we’ve learned that at least this squeaky wheel gets some grease. And they don’t even know how serious I am about my TV and video. Well, maybe they could guess from this blog.

Finally, although there’s no rush, I am going to look into digital cable when the third floor remodel is done (or nearly so). I’ll follow up again then to let you know what I find out. I’d much rather get my networks from NYC and LA as DirecTV does than from Indy (that’s a whole ‘nother rant), but if I have to have Indy, I’d like to have HD as an option. (Yeah, then I could watch useless weather maps and election projections in high-resolution!)

So, thanks, Comcast, for the rapid response and for being reasonable about the “local” network affiliates. Play your cards right and you might get my ISP money too.

It’s Comcraptastic!

Monday, October 6th, 2008

Long before all you jokers got DVR religion, I was already watching all my TV from recordings. I’ve pretty much switched my legion of VCRs for a small army of DVRs, but the concept and the routine are not new to me.

So I come down to do my pre-primetime systems check tonight and two of the machines aren’t getting a cable signal. Everything looks fine, but they weren’t happy.

So I figured it out- some channels weren’t working. That’s not a problem on my end of the cable and I thought maybe they were having a problem at the local office. I called them up to tell them.

Off-hours customer service at Comcast is a little better than it was under Insight, but still not good. At least the phone-answerer knew the answer: those channels as of now are only available on digital cable. I informed them that I had not been informed and that I, personally, am steamed. The response was basically “tough shit” in about one and a half fewer words.

I fired off email to “Rick” from the Comcast website and stewed about how I was going to handle this. There’s no way I can get all my recorders to drive outboard tuners to my satisfaction. And what are they going to charge me to get anywhere close?

So I’m looking over my recording schedule to see how hard this’ll be when, lo and behold, channel 4 switched back on. And 6 too. I’m guessing the huge number of people who suddenly couldn’t watch “Dancing With the Stars” blowing up their switchboard made them change their collective corporate mind.

But what the heck is this? Are they serious? After all the reassuring press that the switch to digital won’t screw over cable subscribers, do they really want to do this? And without running a crawl on the affected channels for weeks like they’ve been doing with the Bright House Debacle? How can that possibly be good?

I’m hoping it was a mistake, but I smell trouble. The only major advantage cable has over satellite for me is that I don’t need to scale it for my use. If I have to get hardware for all my recorders, what’s the difference? Well, I’d probably need a second dish, I guess, but other than that, it’s a toss-up.

Alien Attack?

Sunday, March 9th, 2008

So last night I’m watching “Saturday Night Live”, and during “Weekend Update” the satellite signal goes out. This stinks in myriad ways because I’m not watching it live- I’m DVR-slipped by about 40 minutes. I check the rest of the recording, and it’s black.

I check the current sat signal level and it’s 0. Not good. I check all the cable in the house and look out windows to make sure everything’s still attached. Yep. I put on my coat and walk outside to get a better look (winter coat + night shirt = très séduisant) and everything looked fine.

But no signal.

So I figure it must be the weather, although it didn’t look bad out and that doesn’t usually drop me to zero. So I check my weather radar display and it doesn’t show anything. Then I realize that it isn’t showing anything. Wait- I’m not getting satellite TV and I’m not getting weather data from… satellites! Are we under alien attack?!

I did flip through some cable channels, and they seemed to be working, and Headline News didn’t warn me about Martians- though Nancy Grace was on. Why do they show shows on Headline News when they’ve got regular CNN for that? Anyway, nobody else seemed to be having trouble, so I let it ride.

I did have a cable channel go out too, but I’m wondering if someone messed something up because of DST. Besides, channel 4 is often unreliable. And I probably shouldn’t have been trying to watch “Cheaters” anyway.

This morning (well, afternoon, it’s Sunday), I got up and the sat was coming in fine. Like there was never a problem.

Them aliens is sneaky.

Tonight’s The Night…

Sunday, February 17th, 2008

Don’t forget that:

  • “Dexter” premieres tonight on CBS.
  • It’s not unlikely that it’s going to be delayed by sports, so make your recording long.
  • The first season DVDs are on sale at Target for $20 this week! This is especially significant because the CBS versions will be edited.

Watch “Dexter”, You Slackers!

Thursday, February 14th, 2008

I know I’ve tortured everyone remotely close to me- pretty much from the night it debuted- to check it out, but if you haven’t yet watched the wonder that is “Dexter”, set the mad video machine to record it Sunday from CBS.

And after you enjoy that episode, save yourself some grief and go pick up those DVDs and see it uncut. Best $30 you’ll drop all year, and you won’t have to wait three months to see how it ends.

But you will probably have to wait a while to see the second season. (I’m guessing the DVDs will come out about the time CBS finishes showing season one.) And then (like me!) you’ll have to wait for the third to even be made. The show’s usually on in December on SHO, so I don’t know if the strike will have much effect on its production schedule.

I’ll insert the usual warning that the show’s not for kids- no way, no how- and that CBS is going to have to trim them for time more than content, which is bound to hurt. But if for some reason you haven’t heeded my call yet, give it a try.

It’s already the most popular show SHO’s ever broadcast. World domination is within Dexter’s grasp. Sunday’s the night.

And Speaking of Things That Suck

Monday, December 17th, 2007

Another big boo to anyone publishing a synopsis of the “Dexter” season finale. (Ok, of anything, actually, but especially something like this.) Why? Because anyone who saw it knows what happened and anyone who didn’t probably wants to watch it someday. And that day ain’t today because they don’t get SHO. Most people don’t, you know.

This is the same big giant “Duh” that I had when people squealed about the “Sopranos” finale. No, not everyone was upset about it- at least 60% of people didn’t get to see it. So shut the hell up and at least wait until the DVDs are out.

And, yeah, I’m talkin’ about you TV Guide. You come not to Cheer “Dexter”, but to bury him. Way to give away a whole season in one sentence you douchebags. Don’t read them. Try this:

Cheers to Showtime’s “Dexter” for a fitting ending to another great season. If we haven’t convinced you to subscribe to SHO yet, run, don’t walk, when these DVDs hit the streets.

Jeers to TV Guide for being a bunch of douchebags.

See, you don’t have to be an asshole to say something nice.

I Got Your Innertube Right Here

Monday, December 17th, 2007

News flash! CBSInnertube continues to suck.

OK, that’s hardly news, but it had to be said. I managed to miss the “Survivor” finale last night, much to my annoyance, and had to wait until today to watch it online. Well, should be, but it still can’t be watched at their site. It plays the Staples ad fine, and then just sits there with no indication of what it’s doing. Other episodes play, but the finale does not.

And even if it could be watched, I have learned from previous experience that it a) does not work well on DSL- which is ridiculous considering the low resolution of the video- and b) if I use Safari, it’ll ask me every couple of minutes if it should kill that Flash job (the video player, that is!) that’s running so slow. That requester can’t be ignored (or playback slows to a crawl), so it has to be clicked on nearly continuously, making fullscreen unusable and the whole thing no fun anyway. (Firefox doesn’t do that, but the playback seems choppier.)

ABC’s and Fox’s players are much better. I hadn’t tried NBC lately, but I just did and it seems to work pretty well.

Luckily, I don’t have to do this sort of thing often, but it’s not- and I choose my cliché deliberately- ready for primetime. It’s bad enough to have to watch TV on a tiny window on my screen. (Even fullscreen on my 30″ screen is not as nice as my TV!) It’s bad enough that not all shows are available. (Still haven’t seen the “Cold Case” season premiere- rerun that mother already!) But having buggy, piggy, hard to use software is the puke icing on the crap cake.

So here’s another big Jeer for CBS’ Innertube. Boo!

Bigger, Stronger, Faster

Tuesday, September 4th, 2007

Some time ago, I replaced the drive in my ReplayTV with a larger drive. It never worked right. I couldn’t do two things at once. It could record, or play, or transfer files, but doing any two would cause it to skip or (gads) crash. The drive I used was a Maxtor 250GB that passed all sorts of diagnostics, but the Replay didn’t like it. I used it anyway and worked around the problems it caused.

So this year I decided to try a Seagate DB35. These drives are supposed to be specially made for use in DVRs. I picked up a 750GB one from The Nerds. They had about the best price and came highly recommended.

The drive showed up Friday, so I had all weekend to abuse it. Results? It’s fandamntastic. It’d be enough if it just got the Replay back to working normally, but I’m sure that it’s even better than new. My other Replay still has its original (40GB!) drive, and it loads its much smaller list of programs more slowly than this thing does.

For testing purposes, I set DVArchive to downloading a bunch of files (2 at a time, 500KB/s) while I recorded some movies, while I was watching recorded programs. I did this for a few hours and then went back and watched one of the movies recorded during that time period (while still downloading and recording something else) to see if there were any glitches. Nope, didn’t miss a beat. Of course, that’s how it’s supposed to work, so don’t be too impressed.

OK, I’m sold. I decided to get another one for the other Replay. So I went back to The Nerds, and, guess what? The price has dropped since last week! I think I saved more by waiting than I would’ve in shipping ordering them at the same time. (Would’ve been cheaper to buy them both today, though.)

Anyway, if you’ve got a ReplayTV, I say go for it. I record more TV than you do, and 750GB is a lot. Not as much as I have spinning in my DVArchives by far (you don’t even want to know), but it’s a lot. You’ll love it.

Papal Bull?

Tuesday, April 3rd, 2007

According to IMDb Studio Briefing, on March 12, 2007 the Vatican announced that it “plans to launch an international satellite channel that will provide news and entertainment in seven languages” because the Pope has said that “much of what is transmitted in various forms to the homes of millions of families around the world is destructive.”

What’s an anti-censorship atheist like me say about that? I say good for them. I’d much rather people provide an alternative than try to ruin TV for the rest of us. If they are correct that people want less “destructive” programming, it’s a win-win.

But I’ve got one word for our friends in the big hats: “pax”. Not pax as in Latin (well, not directly) for “peace”, but PAX as in PAX TV. I doubt they’ll fare that well.

“But there are a zillion Catholics out there, ab!” Yes, but the non-denominational PAX TV should’ve had an even bigger (though, perhaps, not as loyal) audience. And last I checked, the most popular shows in the biggest Catholic zones were things like sexy, violent, telenovelas.

Just as I have (a lot of, actually) respect for their movie ratings system, I think it’s a great idea to offer alternative programming for their flock. But I wouldn’t expect it to be both noticeably different and overwhelmingly successful.

My guess, considering what the bishops say about TV, is that the Pope’s views are out of touch even within his organization. Unlike the noisy crusaders I hear about the most, the Big-C Church actually trusts adults to be adults. Well, mostly.

They’re likely much better off producing some new (and branded) shows to sprinkle throughout the existing broadcast and Internet space and not taking the hit of starting up a whole network. If they have one solid success (even if they have a bunch of failures), it’ll say a lot more than adding yet another channel no one watches to the dial.