Since there are no GPS measurements at the campaign sites in the few days preceding the earthquake and since the last survey occurred 2 years before the earthquake, we have to take into account the interseismic site displacements to calculate the coseismic offsets. We calculate the coseismic offset at each site by first fitting a straight line through the 1999 and 2001 survey data and extrapolating it to the day of the earthquake. This gives us the (expected) site position before the earthquake. We then average the positions for the October 2003 survey. This gives us the site positions after the earthquake. This is valid because the survey was performed less than a month after the event, interseismic displacements are negligible during that time interval. The position offsets are then given by the position difference between before and after the earthquake. Note that the estimated positions right before and after the earthquake are shown by a small red dot on the vertical dashed line on Figure 6.3. The corresponding offsets are given in Table 6.3, together with the associated uncertainties, and plotted on a map on Figure 6.6.
| Site | dE | dN | dU |
| ARRO | -5.0 |
-21.8 |
31.1 |
| CAMP | -1.1 |
21.8 |
-160.3 |
| CAPT | -3.7 |
4.5 |
18.1 |
| CASX | -6.5 |
0.9 |
11.1 |
| CRIS | not suitable | for coseismic | measurements |
| HIDA | 15.0 |
9.0 |
2.6 |
| LAVE | -23.3 |
0.4 |
-7.4 |
| MONC | 6.9 |
-1.5 |
-1.0 |
| PEPE | not suitable | for coseismic | measurements |
| REUN | 67.0 |
-10.3 |
79.6 |
| SAGO | -2.8 |
7.7 |
8.6 |
| TERR | -1.2 |
-8.3 |
-27.7 |
| BAR_ | 4.4 |
0.7 |
3.8 |
| LVEG | 7.7 |
3.9 |
0.7 |
| SPED | 3.3 |
0.5 |
2.3 |
| SROD | 7.2 |
2.7 |
1.0 |
|