The model above implies that the rupture occured offshore, with its downdip end located directly below the coastline. It predicts up to 10 cm of vertical coseismic uplift at the coast, in particular in the Puerto Plata area.
This model predicts no significant coseismic deformation (at the precision level of our GPS measurements, i.e. 5 mm horizontally and 8 mm vertically) beyond sites MONC and LAVE. This is consistent with the absence of significant coseismic displacement measured at sites CAPT, SROD, MONC, LVEG, and CASX. It also suggests that the offset measured at sites TERR, ARRO, and LAVE and not of coseismic origin. They may result from lower data quality (at ARRO, for instance, Table 4.3) or from equipment calibration errors during any of the 1999, 2001, or 2003 surveys.
|
Figure 7.2 shows a geologic interpretation of
the coseismic model presented above. Assuming that the North
Hispaniola Fault dips 15
to the southwest, as the preferred
coseismic rupture plane, its surface trace (33 km offshore)
and the depth of the preferred coseismic rupture plane imply
that the rupture occurred above the North Hispaniola Fault.
Note that there is a thrust at the seafloor south of the North
Hispaniola Fault zone that could be the updip extension of the
earthquake rupture (Figure 7.3). This trust could
be an ``out of sequence'' fault that has propagated off the
lower North Hispaniola fault.
Alternatively, the dip angle of the North Hispaniola Fault
maybe less than 15
i (at least for some segments), in which
case it may coincide with the rupture modeled here.
|