EAS 105-THE PLANETS
Prof. Robert L.
Nowack
Lecture 14
Atmosphere on Mars and the Search for Life
Viking
1 and 2 recorded and sent direct atmospheric measurements for Mars. The atmosphere on Mars is 95.4% Carbon
Dioxide, 2.7% Nitrogen, and 1.6% Argon.

Venus has similar atmospheric
components as Mars (except for trace elements). However, the atmosphere on Mars is very
thin. Because the atmosphere is so thin,
temperatures of the lower atmosphere vary widely on a daily basis. As a result, the convecting troposphere layer
varies with location and season. At
night, it practically disappears.
Convection ceases at night and the atmosphere becomes very stable.

A Typical Weather Report: "Light winds from the east in late afternoon,
changing to light winds from southeast after
Several
types of clouds can exist. First, there
are dust clouds raised by winds. During certain times, these can cover
large fractions of the surface. Second,
there are ice-water clouds. These can
form fog around mountains. Finally,
there are carbon dioxide clouds which form a high altitude haze of dry-ice crystals. However, most of the time, the Martian
atmosphere is much clearer than on Earth (except during major dust storms that
occur during the southern hemisphere summer).
Martian Atmosphere

The
Martian atmosphere can be a dynamic place.
On
The
main driver of global circulation is the exchange of carbon dioxide (CO2)
between the atmosphere and the polar caps.
Atmospheric pressure can vary up to 20% with the seasons.
Water on Mars
Liquid water on Mars is largely
absent as a result of the low pressure, as well as low temperatures. In West Lafayette, water boils at 100°C
(212°F) since at this temperature the
upward pressure of the water vapor molecules leaving the liquid water in a pan
just equals the pressure of the overlying atmosphere. However, if we go to higher altitudes, (lower
atmospheric pressures), the boiling temperature would decrease. If we are at an altitude where the pressure
is 0.0061 bars, the boiling temperature is 0°C (but this is also the freezing
point). At this pressure, liquid water can no longer
exist. Thus, even if the surface
temperature gets warm enough, no liquid water would be on Mars (at current atmospheric pressures). Water would immediately boil into the
atmosphere. On Earth, this also happens
for carbon dioxide going directly from dry-ice - vapor. On Mars, this happens to both; carbon dioxide and water.
Since
the atmosphere of Mars is so cold and thin, it can hold very little water
vapor. In this sense, it is dry. However, it holds about the maximum it can at
its pressure and temperature. So,
“relative” humidity on Mars is very high.
It is thus common to see water vapor fogs to form at low elevations at
night.
On
Mars, water vapor is broken apart by ultraviolet radiation from the Sun to form
hydrogen which diffuses up into the upper atmosphere and has been
detected. Still, much of the water must
be tied up in a permafrost subsurface layer and on the northern ice cap. If atmospheric pressures were higher in the
geologic past of Mars, it might have been possible for liquid water to have once
formed. This might explain the runoff
channels on the surface which cut the planets surface in the distant past.
In
January 2004, two robotic rovers, Spirit and
Spirit’s
landing site was Gusev Crater which had old river channels going into it. But, initial evidence was that the rocks were
volcanic and dry. Spirit then traveled
several kilometers to the east to the Columbia Hills, and minerals there were
detected that could suggest that the rocks were once altered by water.
Half
a planet away, the rover
Detection of Life on Mars
The
primary objectives of the Viking missions were to land on Mars and search for
life using an automated miniaturized biological laboratory. The entire
spacecraft was carefully sterilized to insure against contamination from Earth. They chose to look for microorganisms. (They also had cameras in case a giraffe
might walk by.)
They
first had to ask: "What is life?” Even
philosophers have had a surprisingly difficult time with this question. The scientists chose to look for "life as
we know it" - life based on complex carbon-based chemistry which breathed
gas or consumes nutrients and leaves behind organic wastes.
Three Main Experiments of Viking 1 and 2

(2) LR; Labeled Release Experiment: This followed a similar strategy,
except the nutrients were tagged with radioactive atoms. The release of these atoms into the
atmosphere of the chamber could then be detected.

(3) PR; Pyrolitic Release Experiment: A more general strategy -
maintaining soil sample in essentially a Martian environment. (Martian micro-organisms might be killed by
the water and nutrients.)
The soil sample was exposed to 14CO2,
tagged radioactive carbon dioxide, and artificial sunlight. After a period of time, the gas was removed
and the soil was baked. The idea was if
living microbes in the soil breathed in the 14C rich air, they would
incorporate 14CO2 into themselves. Detectors would then be sensitive to
radioactive 14CO2, which would be released when the soil
sample was cooked.

Viking Results
Much
to the surprise of the scientists who designed these experiments, all 3 initially gave strong positive
results! Apparently, the Martian soil
reacted strongly with the nutrients and gas in the test chambers. However, this was different than expected for
living organisms since the immediate activity was high, but declined with
time. This is just the opposite of that
usually found for living organisms. Were
they being killed off ?
Finally, the gas chromatograph
did not detect any organic chemicals in the soil, down to parts per billion! How could life exist without organic
chemicals? Scientists concluded that
life was not being detected. Instead,
the soil itself appeared to be much more chemically activity than Earth
soils. This might result from direct
exposure of the surface on Mars to ultraviolet radiation - which breaks up
carbon molecules. It can also produce
compounds called super-oxides in the soil which are highly reactive when
brought in contact with water.
Is
There Life on Mars? These results seem
to conclude no at this time (at least regarding life as we know it). However, more exploration of the surface of
Mars is required for a more definitive answer.
New
clues have emerged recently from a meteorite retrieved from
Mars Rocks on Earth

About 13,000 years ago, a 4.2 pound chunk of rock fell onto
the ice of
Researchers identified organic molecules, minerals and
cracks filled with carbonate globules that could be associated with bacterial
life. They even detected microscopic,
worm-like structures that could be bacterial fossils. Each of these findings alone could have
non-biological explanations. All of them
together suggested to researchers that they might have found the first clear
evidence that life is not unique to Earth.
Skeptics
caution against jumping to conclusions.
NASA urged other scientists to undertake even more rigorous tests.
Early History of Mars
Mars
presumably formed with the rest of the planetary system about 4.6 billion years
ago. From the existence of heavily
cratered uplands on Mars, the crust had formed in time for the late heavy
bombardment period (about 3.9 billion years ago). This period may well have been a period of
enhanced erosion - Mars could have had just dense enough of an atmosphere to
allow some liquid water. However, the
atmosphere slowly thinned.
The
volcanic plains in the north formed near the equator about 3.1 to 3.9 billion
years ago. As the planet cooled, a bulge
formed near the equator, creating the Valles-Marineris and the large volcanoes.
Nitrogen
on Mars is highly enriched in its heavier isotope (similar to deuterium
enrichment on Venus). This suggests that
nitrogen has been lost to space on Mars over geologic time. Mars' atmosphere must have been denser in its
geologic past.
This
figure compares Venus' atmosphere to a modified Earth and Mars atmosphere
assuming no weathering, no life and no escape
to outer space.

The early Mars atmosphere could
have sustained a much warmer surface temperature from a greenhouse effect (and
liquid water could possibly have flowed).
What
happened? Carbon dioxide could have
dissolved. As carbon dioxide was
diminishing, nitrogen was escaping into space.
This resulted in decreasing surface pressure. The planet's surface would begin to
cool. Water vapor would decrease in
atmosphere further diminishing the greenhouse effect. This could result in the opposite of a runaway
greenhouse - a runaway refrigerator.
A Comparison of the Inner Planets
Table
below compares the present atmospheres of the 3 inner planets and Jupiter.

For the inner planets, the
following paths might have taken (note b means bars).

The upper left column lists
estimates of the amounts of volatile species initially present in the
terrestrial planets’ atmospheres. The
upper right lower columns show possible evolutionary paths, including estimated
abundances for several gases at various critical times.
The
critical atmospheric parameters for an inner planet appear to be the overall
size of the planet (what gases can be retained), as well as the distance from the
Sun (heat flux from the Sun).

The Earth lies in the habitable zone of
our Sun. Venus and Mercury are on the
hot side of the habitable zone. Mars
sits on the cold fringe. The other
planets are well into the cold side.
Distances from the Sun are given in astronomical units. (1 A.U. = 93 million miles)
We can then define a zone about
the Sun where the heat flux is just right for a possible habitable zone for
life as we know it (also liquid water is possible).

Interior of terrestrial planets as deduced
from a wide range of observations. The
crust, mantle and core of a planet are distinguished from one another on the
basis of their geochemistry. It is not
clear whether the Moon and Venus have discrete cores, nor does Mercury
necessarily have a chemically distinct crust.

Age distribution of present planetary
surfaces. The thickness of the curve at
a given time is an estimate of the percentage of the planet having the
indicated age. For the Moon, 80% of the
present surface was emplaced in its first 600 million years and hardly any
materials were formed after 3 billion years ago. Mercury appears comparable. Most of Mars’ surface was formed in the first
˝ of its history with waning volcanism continuing to the present. Venus is uncertain with indications of both
old and young units. On Earth, the only
planet with demonstrable plate tectonics, over 2/3 of the surface (ocean
basins) was formed less than 200 million years ago and surface rocks older than
3.5 billion years are rare.