Purdue University

EAS 557

Introduction to Seismology

Robert L. Nowack

Lecture 16

Free Oscillations

 

 

            We have so far considered waves generated by earthquakes as propagating disturbances in infinitely extended spaces (i.e., whole spaces, half spaces with a free surface, a layered half space, etc.).  But, the Earth is a bounded region; to first order a sphere.

 

            In such bounded systems, we can consider the total motion to be made up of a sum of vibrations or “normal modes of free oscillations”.  Thus, a seismogram recording motion from a distant earthquake can be thought of as a series of traveling waves P and S, etc. or as a sum of “standing waves” or free oscillations adding together at a given location x and time t to produce the observed seismogram with all of the “body waves” and “surface waves” included.

 

            So, what is a “normal mode” or free oscillation?

 

1)   It satisfies the elastodynamic equation of motion

2)   It satisfies all the boundary conditions

3)   It can exist without a source

 

For a finite body there will be a discrete set of modes (possibly large, but countable in number).  Thus, the solution can be written as a sum of modes as  modes.

 

            Ex)  Vibrations on a fixed string.

 

 

 

 

For a string then, we can write the equation of motion as

 

     for  and

 

The speed is , where T is the tension of string and  is the density.

 

The boundary conditions are .  The initial conditions are  and  for .  Use separation of variables (S.O.V.) to solve this, let

 

 

Then

 

 

where k is some constant.  Then,

 

 

This is an eigenvalue problem with

 

 

The solution can be written as

 

 

where from the boundary conditions

 

 

 

Then,

 

  or   ,   for   

 

The  are called the eigenvalues and  are called the eigenfunctions.

 

            Solving for  then

 

 

 

The  are called the normal modes (or free oscillations) for the string.  It is a global solution on the domain .

 

            Now we must superimpose normal modes to satisfy the initial conditions  and .  Then,  is a “standing wave” with nodal points at  ().  These normal modes can also be expressed as a sum of propagating waves of the form .  Recall that

 

 

and

 

 

then,

 

 

 

Thus, a standing wave can be written as a combination of left and right propagating traveling waves.  This contrasting view of standing waves or modes as reverberating traveling waves is a fundamental theme coming up again and again in seismology.  Thus, in terms of normal modes the resulting motion can be written as a sum of normal modes satisfying the initial conditions

 

 

The frequency of each mode is  and these form a discrete spectrum.  The contribution from each frequency  may be represented by an amplitude

 

 

thus,

 

 

 

 

Strictly speaking, we use the term spectrum for something we can Fourier analyze (i.e., the displacement history at a point  on the string ), then

 

 

 

 

 

Because of friction on the string, we get a continuous spectrum instead of just a line spectrum.  Each peak gives us a normal mode frequency.

 

            Well, you might say that a vibrating string doesn’t look much like the Earth.  However, all that we’ve talked about carries over to the Earth as a much more complex boundary value problem.

 

 

 

Free Oscillations of the Earth

 

            Recall the elastodynamic equation

 

   with   

 

where  is the body force due to gravity.  What we are faced with is the solution to this equation subject to vanishing tractions on the Earth’s surface and continuity of displacements and tractions at any internal boundary.  Also, we must include the body forces due to gravity here.  This makes a difference for periods T > 200 sec.

 

Cartesian coordinates are inappropriate for low frequency waves in the spherical Earth.  Thus, we must introduce spherical coordinates.

 

 

 

 

(from Stein and Wysession, 2003)

 

For example, let’s look at the free oscillations of a homogeneous liquid sphere where

 

 

where P is the pressure subject to  on the surface .  Then, in spherical coordinates

 

 

 

 

In exactly the same way as for the string, we use separation of variables and look for a solution of the form

 

 

and for each of the terms,

 

1)  

 

2)   where l and m are integers  and  are called the associated Legendre functions, i.e.

 

 

 

 

3    gives the amplitude as a function of depth in the Earth.  This is similar to the eigenfunction in depth for surface waves and for a spherical Earth is written in terms of spherical Bessel functions.

 

 

 

 

      The eigenvalues for this problem can be written  where n is the overtone number and l is the spherical Bessel function order.  n is also equal to the number of zero crossings in depth.

 

 

 

Elastic Earth – Vector Spherical Harmonics

 

            As in the case for surface waves, for a spherical Earth with elastic properties that vary only as a function depth, then the motions separate two types of motion

 

1)   Toroidal motions have particle displacements with  and .  Toroidal motions have only horizontal motion and are like “SH” Love waves.  They are written as .

 

2)   Spheroidal motions have particle displacements with .  Spheroidal motions include both vertical and horizontal motion like “P-SV” Rayleigh waves and are written as . 

 

For both cases,  resulting in  values.  Toroidal and spheriodal oscillations have their own sets of normal mode frequencies which depend on the constants n, m, l determined from the boundary conditions.

 

            If the effect of the Earth’s rotation is neglected, then the eigenvalues  are independent of m.  The (2l + 1) degeneracy then results in just one Fourier amplitude peak.  However, with rotation included this degeneracy breaks down.  This is similar to rotational splitting of atomic spectrum lines due to a magnetic field.

 

            Examples of the vibrations of different spheroidal and toroidal modes are shown below.

 

 

 

 

            Ex)

 

 

 

 

These are noted again as  and  where

 

n = the overtone number; the number of zero crossings in the radial direction in depth

l = the mode number; the number of nodes in latitude

m = the azimuthal order; the number of nodes in longitude

 

            Ex)  The amplitude spectrum of the 1960 Chile earthquake (Mag. 8.3) recorded in California is shown below.  The rotation of the Earth has split this modal peak for  into two frequencies at periods of 54.7 min. and 53.1 min.  This results in a waveform shown below due to interference between the split modes.

 

 

 

 

(from Stein and Wysession, 2003)

 

The width of the spectral peaks depend on the anelasticity of the Earth and also on whether or not the frequency resolution is fine enough to resolve additional “split modes” close to the mode corresponding to m = 0.

 

 

 

 

The width of the spectral peak can be written as  where Q is the anelasticity factor.  Attenuation then decays the wave as  in time.

 

            For the largest earthquakes, detectable long period ground motions can continue for several days.  This is needed for the resolution of nodal peaks in spectrum.  However, long period ground noise results in some limitations even for large magnitude events M > 8.

 

Technically, one can compute the entire seismogram by the synthesis of normal modes and this is now often done to compute seismograms which include the body waves.  As we saw for the vibrating string, standing waves can be considered as a superposition of traveling waves.  We might then guess that a normal mode of the Earth could be viewed as surface waves traveling in opposite directions over the Earth.

 

            Ex)

 

 

 

 

(from Stein and Wysession, 2003)

 

            Below is a plot of the observed and calculated eigenfrequencies for the spheroidal and toroidal modes as a function of angular order l.

 

 

 

 

(from Lay and Wallace, 1995)

 

            Below is a plot of vertical component seismograms for the deep Columbian earthquake of July 31, 1970.  These show waves traveling around the Earth several times.  Computed seismograms are on top and observed seismograms are below. 

 

 

 

 

(from Aki and Richards, 2002)

 

            Below is a plot of normal mode seismograms for three source receiver pairs.  The top trace for each is the observed and the bottom is the observed data.  The Earth model is laterally varying obtained from a tomographic inversion.  These types of data were used by Woodhouse and Dziewonski (1984) to perform one of the first tomographic inversions for upper mantle structure using normal modes.

 

 

 

 

(from Stein and Wysession, 2003)