Hellenistic
Wars of Succession, 323-279 BC
{Most successful
text: M. Cary, A History of the Greek World
from 323 to 146 BC, London
1972}
The Macedonian
Wars of Succession (the Wars of the Diodochi or
Successors) are generally divided into four stages: 1st War of
Succession (322-319), 2nd War of Succession (318-315), 3rd
War of Succession (314-311) and the 4th War of Succession (308-301).
Given the bewildering nature of the narrative it is better to conceptualize the
conflict in two stages: that of the wars to succeed Alexander as emperor
(322-306 BC) and that to partition the empire into separate realms (306-279 BC).
Stage I. 323-311/306, Wars to succeed Alexander as Emperor.
At Alexander's
death, the phalanx chose Philip Arrhidaeus, the
cavalry agreed to a joint succession, Philip and Alexander IV, son of Roxane
and Alexander, who was born in August 323 following Alexander’s demise. Antipater remained in command of Macedonia; Craterus became the guardian of King Philip III Arrhidaeus and treasury director; Perdiccas
bearing Alexander’s signet ring, became regent to the two kings and supreme commander
of the imperial armies. No further campaigns were planned; each of Alexander’s
generals focused on organizing the various provinces of the empire that they
obtained by mutual agreement. The first
crisis was the rebellion in 325 of 23000 Greek/Macedonian colonists settled by
Alexander in Bactria
and beyond (The Bactrian Mutiny).
Leonnatus died in Lamian War, 322,
instigated by Alexander’s various decrees insisting that he be referred to as a
god and that the Greek states accept back some 20,000 exiles he supported.
Antipater successfully suppressed this Greek rebellion (led by Athens),
dispanded the League of Corinth, and began the precedent of
imposing Macedonian garrisons in Greece,
particularly in the three “fetters of Greece”:
Demetrias, Thermopylae, and Corinth. Perdiccas
meanwhile attempted to exert supreme authority over all other satraps,
summoning those he distrusted to appear at his court for investigations. Perdiccas in Cappadocia killed Meleager
and ordered the arrest of Antigonus, satrap of Lycia,
who resisted and fled to Antipater.
Olympias, meanwhile, widened the gap between Antipater and Perdiccas by offering her daughter Cleopatra’s hand to Perdiccas. Antipater and the other generals believed that Perdiccas intended on assuming Alexander’s throne, and
invaded Asia Minor in 322. Ptolemy, governor
of Egypt, meanwhile persuaded Philip III to let him “kidnap” the body of
Alexander, at Damascus, on route to the
Macedonian royal tombs in Aegae, and convey it to Egypt
(disseminating a report that Alexander had wished to be buried at Siwah. The body remained at Memphis,
however until Ptolemy completed its mausoleum in Alexandria). This prompted Perdiccas to declare war on him as well. To some degree the
Macedonian hierarchy was divided between those who supported the realm (the two
kings Alexander and Philip), including Perdiccas,
Olympias, and Eumenes of Cardia, and those who opposed Perdiccas,
Antipater, Craterus, Antigonus,
and Ptolemy.
Perdiccas, bearing Alexander's ring, was killed in Egypt by his
own officers, Peithon, Antigenes,
and Seleucus, after a failed invasion of Ptolemy’s
province in 321. Members of the
victorious party assembled the army at Triparadisos
in Syria to reorganize the empire. Antipater replaced Perdiccas
as regent to the 2 kings and for the first time since 334, brought Macedonian
royalty back to Pella. Ptolemy and Lysimachus retained their satrapies (Egypt and Thrace),
and Seleucus received Babylon. Eumenes was condemned to death and Antigonus the One-Eyed, appointed strategos
in Asia, was ordered to hunt him down. Antipater soon died of old age in
319. His son Cassander
could not accept his choice to replace himself as regent, Polyperchon
(a veteran of India), so he fled to Antigonus in Asia
Minor and incited a new alliance of Antigonus, Cassander, Ptolemy and Lysimachus, vs. Polyperchon.
Polyperchon withdrew to the Peloponnesus where he rapidly
became irrelevant. In 317, Eumenes of Cardia, formerly Alexander's secretary,
killed Craterus and was himself pursued eastward by Antigonus. Despite demonstrated ability, Eumenes’ ability
to command respect was limited by the fact that he was not Macedonian. In a two year campaign, Antigonus
pursued Eumenes across the Middle East and had him killed in Iran, after defeating
his army (including the surly veterans of the Silver Shields) at the Battle of Parataecene in 316, For the moment Antigonus
assumed command of the eastern provinces. He also killed Peithon
and had Antigenes burned alive. Meanwhile, in Macedonai Cassander, son of
Antipater, captured and executed Olympias (316 BC), who had previously
eliminated Philip Arrhidaeus and his wife. Cassander likewise captured Alexander IV and Roxane, whom
he executed in 310 BC. At which point there was no longer a royal family to
feign loyalty to. Antigonus, meanwhile, decided he
could not hold the eastern satrapies and withdrew to the Mediterranean coast
carrying with him the entire stored treasury of the Persian Empire. When the
other satraps demanded shares of the bullion, he spurned them and set in motion
yet another round of conflicts. With the accumulated wealth of the empire
(perhaps 50,000 talents) Antigonus proceeded to
construct the largest naval fleet in the Mediterranean. His son, Demetrius,
quickly rose to the command of Macedonia’s first amphibious military force,
some 250 decked warships and transports capable of conveying 20,000 men and 8000
horse back and forth from Phoenicia to Greece. To facilitate these movements he successfully besieged dozens of harbor cities
along the route and earned the name Demetrius Poliorketes,
the City Besieger.
Stage
II, 311/306-279 BC, Wars to partition empire into Separate principalities (310
BC, Cassander, son of Antipater, kills Roxane and
Alexander IV).
In 306, after
Demetrius defeated Ptolemy’s navy at the Battle of Salamis and conquered all of
Cyprus, Antigonus declared himself king. At this
point the vast empire of Antigonus extended from the
Aegean coast of Anatolia all the way to Cilicia, Syria, and Mesopotamia. His
son, Demetrius, successfully added Athens, Corinth, and other parts of Greece. All
other contenders followed suit (Cassander, Seleucus, Ptolemy, Lysimachus). Lysimachus who was of
Thessalian origin but an enfranchised Macedonian, had remained quiet for 20
years as satrap of Thrace; he broke out in 302 BC. With the support of the others, Lysimachus
invaded Antigonid Anatolia and forced Antigonus and
Demetrius to confront him on the battlefield one more time. Due to the timely
arrival of Seleucus’ elephant corps, Lysimachus
proved victorious. At Battle of Ipsus, in Phrygia, in
301 BC, Lysimachus and Seleucus defeated Antigonus and his son Demetrius Poliorketes.
Antigonus died in battle at the age of 80.
Cassander died in 298 BC, leaving behind two warring sons. Demetrius
Poliorketes, son of Antigonus,
continued to maraud the Mediterranean coast as a “pirate king.” He seized
control of Athens on three occasions, but overstayed his welcome there. At one
point he outwitted the sons of Cassander and seized
control of Macedonia proper. However, in his attempt to rebuild his naval
forces he imposed inordinate taxes on his citizens and was driven out by a
disgruntled populace. Chased by his adversaries, he was eventually cornered in
the Amanus Mts. Of Syria and surrendered to Seleucus. In captivity, Demetrius would eventually drink
himself to death in 284. His son, Antigonus Gonatas, who continued to rule Corinth, would eventually
live to assume the throne of Macedonia.
Pyrrhus of Epirus and Lysimachus also had designs on the Macedonian
throne at this time.
In 282 at the
Battle of Corupedium (in Lydia, near Magnesia ad Sipylum), Seleucus defeated and
killed Lysimachus. However, in 280 Seleucus was
killed at the Hellespont by Ptolemy Ceraunus (a disgruntled
son of Ptolemy I who was displaced by his younger brother for the throne). Ceraunus momentarily seized Macedonia, but he in turn died
during the Gallic invasions of 279 BC. Ptolemy I of Egypt, meanwhile, had
passed away quietly in 282 BC, after successfully handing his realm down to his
second son Ptolemy II Philadelphus. In other words,
by 280 BC all the former marshalls of Alexander were
gone. In Anatolia, meanwhile, Philetairos, the Greek
secretary (and a eunuch) of Lysimachus, assumed control of Pergamum, defeated
the Gauls, and drove them into the interior
(Galatia), and founded Attalid dynasty of
Pergamum. His brother Attalus I, had
four sons; together, they would found the one
non-Macedonian realm of the Hellenistic era. After 279 BC, a new generation of
leaders assumed control of the tattered former empire of Alexander. From this
point until the intervention of Rome, Macedonian suzerainty settled into a
stable pattern of four sustained successor states: Antigonid Macedonia, Attalid Pergamum, Seleucid Syria, and Ptolemaic Egypt.
4. Hellenistic Successor states to
Alexander's world empire.
Antigonid Macedonia (279-167
BC) - capital at Pella.
Following an era of considerable political confusion, Antigonus
Gonatas, the grandson of one of Alexander's leading generals, was able to
secure control of Philip II's bastion of Macedonia proper, with its capital at
Pella. In comparison with the competing Hellenistic dynasties, Macedonia
resembled somewhat a cultural backwater, but this appraisal belies the
strengths furnished by its topography, its resources, and its manpower. In
comparison with its rivals Macedonia
presented itself as a compact state well defended by mountains allowing few
means of access. Its timber resources and silver mines provided it with
significant revenues with which to maintain the leading military establishment
of the Greek world. Macedonia was, after all, the homeland of the armies used
by Philip and Alexander to conquer the eastern Mediterranean world. It remained
the chief recruiting ground for the armies of the Hellenistic dynasties, the
most effective of which remained that of the Antigonids themselves. The
Macedonian phalanx of the Antigonids posed a serious threat to all Greek states
of the Aegean, and when commanded by aggressive kings such as Philip V (c.
220-180 BC) conducted razzias as far removed as the Peloponnesus, invading
Laconia under Antigonus Gonatas, and Ionia, besieging
Eumenes II at Pergamum under Philip V. The Roman Republic found the Antigonids
exceedingly difficult adversaries, fighting them 3 times, during the Hannibalic
War (when Philip V posed as an ally to Hannibal himself and invaded Greece,
besieging Athens itself), again in 201-197 (when L. Quinctius
Flamininus defeated Philip V at Cynoscephalae with
strong backing from Greek allies), and a third time in 172-168 BC (when L. Aemilius Paullus defeated Philip's
son Perseus at the Battle of Pydna). At this point
the dynasty was deposed and the Romans attempted to reorganize Macedonia into
a dismembered settlement of 4 small republics. When this failed in 148 BC,
Roman forces again had to intervene to suppress Macedonian and wider Greek
uprisings (including the destruction of Corinth
in 146 BC) and reduced Macedonia
tp provincial status, the first such Roman province
in the Aegean world.
Attalid Pergamum (270-133 BC) - capital at
Pergamum
Founded by Philetairos, the Greek secretary of
Alexander's general Lysimachus. When the latter fell fighting Seleucus, Philetairos (a eunuch)
withdrew with his commander's military war chest to a mountain fortress that
ultimately became his palace acropolis of Pergamum. He gained royal recognition
through his successful efforts at repulsing the Gallic invasion of western Anatolia in 270-269 BC. Philetairos
drove the Gauls into the Phrygian highlands where
they settled in the region thereafter known as Galatia. He became recognized by
the Greek cities of the coastal region as a liberator and savior and
established his hegemony over them. Since he had no children, his domain passed
to the four sons of his brother, Attalus I. Normally, so many rival dynasts
would have spelled disaster (as it eventually did in Syria and Egypt), but the Attalids became celebrated for their cooperation at state
building. They handed the royal authority from one to another in succession and
managed to elevate their realm into the top echelon of Mediterranean states.
Particularly skillful diplomacy with Rome
enabled the Attalids to enjoy further success during
the early second century BC. At their peak under Eumenes II, c. 190-168 BC,
they controlled the entire western seaboard of Anatolia
and much of Phrygian highland as well. In direct competition with the Ptolemies
and the Seleucids, the Attalids succeeded at
establishing Pergamum
as a leading cultural center, its library second only to that of Alexandria, its
sculpture, woven tapestries, and ceramics prized throughout the Mediterranean. An expressive, highly baroque style of
sculpture known as the Asian school, set important trends in the Greek world
and profoundly influenced artistic development at Rome. The Attalids
likewise competed for control of the eastern luxury trade, relying on the
overland route of the now ancient Persian
Royal Road across Anatolia.
When a dynastic dispute threatened to undermine the stability of Pergamum at the end of
the second century BC, King Attalus III (138-133) left his royal domain to the
people of the Roman
Republic in his will. His
nobles were concerned about security after his passing, and to prevent a
dynastic dispute (which ultimately did arise) he wrote this into his will as a
form of "poison pill." At his demise in 133 BC, ambassadors brought
the report of his bequest to Rome,
where it was accepted and secured by military intervention. By 126 BC the royal
territories of Pergamum
became the Roman province of Asia, the richest
of all Roman provinces. Abusive exploitation by Roman tax collectors
(publicans) induced a province-wide revolt in Asia
in 88 BC, culminating in the massacre reportedly of some 80,000 Romans,
Italians, their families, and servants throughout the province. L. Cornelius
Sulla restored order in 84 BC just prior to his assumption of the dictatorship
at Rome.
Indemnities imposed by Sulla remained burdensome throughout the following
decade, but the resilience and economic vitality of the province ultimately
enabled impressive recovery. In 63 BC the Roman orator and senator, M. Tullius
Cicero, stated that approximately 40% of tribute raised by the Republican
empire came from Asia alone. The merger of
Greco-Roman culture was probably most successfully achieved here. In the
imperial era, cities such as Pergamum,
Ephesus, Sardis, and Miletus ranked among the
leading cultural centers of the Roman world.
Seleucid Syria (305-66 BC) - capital at Antioch
Founded by Seleucus, like Ptolemy, one of a handful
of generals to survive Alexander's campaigns in India, the empire had its
capital at Antioch, but enjoyed numerous other Greek colonies in the Syrian
territory, including Syrian Alexandria, Laodicea, Beroea,
and Edessa. The heartland of the empire remained in coastal Syria, but its
territories usually included Mesopotamia as
well (Seleucia).
As late as 205 BC, Antiochus III conducted military operations to restore
Seleucid authority as far away as the Indus in
the East and the Aegean in the West. However,
his defeat by the army of the Roman
Republic at the Battle of Magnesia in 188
BC compelled him to restrict his authority to the Seleucid heartland of the
north Syrian coast. Generally, the Seleucid foreign policy looked to the
Mediterranean theater. Afghanistan
was taken by the Mauryans and the Kushans; Iran was
reorganized by the Parthians.
Through methodical efforts at colonization, development of artisan production
in Syria-Palestine and by challenging the Ptolemies for control of the eastern
luxury trade, the Seleucids enjoyed significant wealth. Its cities were
prominent for their craft work -- perfumes, incense, purple dyed clothing,
tapestries, a highly polished red-slipped fineware
known as Eastern Sigillata A. The artisans of
the Seleucid empire established a number of material trends for Mediterranean
civilization.
The Seleucids were energetic colonizers, founding numeorus
cities throughout Anatolia,
Syria, and Mesopotamia named Antioch
and Seleucia.
They were largely responsible for encouraging the out-migration of Aegean Greek
populations to non-Greek areas of the Mediterranean,
helping to develop Hellenistic "koine"
Greek culture. It is commonly stated that the Roman Empire
reaped the benefit of centuries of colonizing work by the Seleucids.
Their weakness was to some degree the problems posed by the high diversity of
their subject peoples. Their empire arguably attempted to control the most
diverse populations of any of the successor states. Syria-Palestine remained a
very unstable region, for example, with Greek, Phoenician, Jewish, and Aramaean
population elements frequently engaging in vehement ethnic hostility
(culminating in the revolt of the Maccabees in 122 BC). Dynastic disputes
caused the dynasty to implode c. 160-140 BC. A century of civil war and chaos
ensued until ultimately the Roman general Pompey the Great absorbed the
remaining vestiges of the empire into the Roman empire
as provinces in 66 BC. Remarkably, the Romans viewed the Seleucid dynasty as a
viable military threat until the end of the second century BC, and the creative
genius of the dynasty's craftsmen remained unrivaled.
Ptolemaic Egypt (305-27
BC) - capital at Alexandria
Founded by Ptolemy, like Seleucus, one of the
youngest generals to follow Alexander to India and back, Ptolemaic Egypt rose to
become the most spectacular of successor states to Alexander. Its capital, Alexandria reportedly
attained a population of 1 million at the height of the Roman era. Ptolemy and
his successors successfully harnessed and maximized the grain production of the
Nile, converting Egypt
into the "bread basket to the Mediterranean."
Together with Rhodes they combined to assume
near monopolistic control of trade in grain and wine throughout the Mediterranean and Black Sea
regions. Ptolemaic explorers also learned the prevailing patterns of the
monsoon winds of the Indian Ocean to establish
a lucrative maritime trade with Arabia and India. Alexandria quickly
supplanted Athens
as the most cosmopolitan urban center of the world. Its spacious protected
harbors, resort-lined canals, and broad avenues designed by Alexander the Great
himself made the city an attractive destination for talented Greeks seeking
better opportunities abroad. The Museum, the great library, the Mausoleum of
Alexander and the Ptolemies, and the great lighthouse were all celebrated
monuments. The Ptolemies established reputations as architectural innovators,
as demonstrated by the fact that the Roman building form, the basilica,
imitated an Alexandrian prototype known as the stoa
basilica, or King's Stoa.
During the third century BC the Ptolemies commanded an extensive eastern
Mediterranean naval empire (Cyprus,
Crete, the Aegean,
south Anatolia), drawing on Greek population
areas for manpower. They earned the reputation of being the "paymasters of
the Mediterranean" for their high-paying
recruitment of mercenaries. Dynastic disputes and military losses to the
neighboring and rival Seleucids led to gradual political and military decline
during the second century BC, however. An astute diplomatic relationship with
the Roman Republic prevented Seleucid incursions
on more than one occasion; however, the Ptolemies gradually became recognized
as the "sick man" of the Mediterranean.
The last dynast, Cleopatra (52-30 BC), actually attempted to exploit personal
relationships with Julius Caesar (by whom she had a son) and Mark Antony (more
children) to revitalize Ptolemaic influence and perhaps even to establish
herself as a Ptolemaic consort at Rome.
However, Octavian's defeat of Antony
and Cleopatra in 32 BC put an end to these ambitions. Octavian seized Egypt for
his own, making the kingdom part of the Julio-Claudian patrimony, to be
governed by private procurators. Egypt continued to serve as the
"bread basket" during the Roman Empire,
furnishing grain for the burgeoning population at Rome.
Confronted by the scale of these empires, traditional Greek city states had
little choice but to organize themselves into loosely constructed federations,
if only to resist pressure exerted by Hellenistic dynasts. The Aetolian League emerged in central
mainland Greece;
the Achaean League in the Peloponnesus (including Corinth, but not Sparta). Certain states, Rhodes, Athens, Sparta, remained
independent, Rhodes because of its importance to Mediterranean trade and its
naval power; Athens because of its status as an international cultural center
and "university town"; Sparta because of its secure borders and
generally xenophobic behavior. But trends definitely shifted in the direction
of the new empires. Greek mercenaries, citizens down at their luck, and/or
nobles seeking greater opportunities migrated eastward to join the
Greek-speaking intelligentsia of the Hellenistic capitals, to serve in
Hellenistic armies, or to participate in colonizing enterprises. The common
denominator to membership in the Hellenistic hierarchy, regardless of ethnic
origin, was Greek language and Greek culture, obtained exclusively through
educational training in the Greek gymnasium. Many Hellenistic kings continued
to employ the "meritocratic" policies of Philip and Alexander, recruiting
the "best and the brightest" of the Greek world to command their
armies and to serve as governors, courtiers, financiers, and ambassadors.
Hierarchical status at the Hellenistic court was designated by recognition as
"a friend of the king," and marriage alliances with the royal
families cemented such relationships closer still. The emerging international
community that ran the Hellenistic world assumed a confident new attitude that
transcended traditional loyalties to the Greek polis. They perceived of
themselves as "kosmopolitai" (cosmopolitans), or citizens of the
world; people so adept with the customs and institutions of the new order that
they were at home anywhere in the eastern Mediterranean.
This new attitude had a profound effect on society, arts, and philosophy.