Visit to Horticulture Lab with Burkhard Schulz

November 5th, 2009

As preparation for the visit I would like them to watch a few of the videos
that we produced in our HORT301 Plant Physiology course. They are all short
just a few minutes and I would like to refer to the production and effect of
this work to your students.
They can be found here:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iHfA8peTZBc

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BF2B4A-z474

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xMKN9Q5FJh4

http://www.scivee.tv/node/11151

http://www.scivee.tv/node/11148

http://www.scivee.tv/node/11147

Mary Hambleton’s Hard Rain Exhibit

November 3rd, 2009

The “Hard Rain” gallery exhibition of works by Mary Hambleton may be some of the most “normal” pieces of artwork that we’ve studied in this class so far. Perhaps this is due to the more tradition style of “art form” used by Hambleton, or even the relatively appealing designs and shaps in her works. Whatever the reason, it seemed that most, if not everyone in the class to at least appreciate the works in one way or another.

It is clear from the introduction by Tiffany Bell that Hambleton focused on art using abstractions of color, shape, idea, and more particularly, her cancer. Understanding the background of Hambleton played a big role in understanding her art. Hard Rain was an exhibit of her late works, and it was very clear how these late works differed from some of the early works mentioned in the article by Bell.

Several things struck me as memorable in this gallery. First was the liberal use of PET scans in many of the works that were probably very reflecive in nature. As Asheley mentioned in her response, these works carry a feeling of life and death, which many viewers may not be so quick to embrace. The thought of the possiblity of one’s own demise is often enough to turn one away from such works. The second piece that stood out was Enough. This work was drastically different asthetically compared to everything else in the gallery. The idea was clear: she has had enough. While at the gallery, Breanna mentioned to me that it was an extremely depression piece. I agree. But I think such a piece really helps to complete the gallery by showing the frustrated side of Hambleton during her late years.

Lastly, I would like to bring up Waiting for a Miracle and Hard Rain as two of my favorite pieces. Waiting for a Miracle strongly connected the essence of life, death, time, and how they change. The blocks above the “timeline” emphasize some ideas of life that Hambleton was probably thinking about at the time. I feel that Hard Rain is a perfect example of how Hambleton endows her work with the “spritual or mythical content” that Bell mentions. It has a hint of what I believe is in some of her early works while possesing other features similar to her late works. A very thoughtful piece.

This exhibit obviously relates the both nature and technology in many ways with the PET scans, cancer, and etc. But this is perhaps also the most subtle form of nature/art/technology that we have studied so far and was both enjoyalbe and refreshing.

Mary Hambleton “Hard Rain” Exhibit Response

November 2nd, 2009

Mary Hambleton’s work was, overall, aesthetically pleasing and meaningful at the same time.  While many of the works were bright, colorful, playful abstracts featuring swirls, circles, and straight lines that were pleasant to look at, many others incorporated her personal PET scans of skin cancer spreading and allowed one to really see and feel her pain as a cancer patient.

Although this exhibit focused on Mary Hambleton’s late works, it was quite possible to divide her late works into two periods, that roughly corresponded with the diagnosis of her cancer.  Previously, her work had been largely abstract, focusing on shapes like circles, that reminded the viewer of one of two extremes in relation to the world.  Some of these paintings made one think of the universe, giving a feeling of fleeting insignificance.  Others seemed to be an extreme magnification of a cell, showing the many organelles, leading one to feel that they were the sum of many parts.

While there was no exact correlation between the shift in her works and her diagnosis with melanoma, because her works are extremely laborious and time intensive process, there was an abrupt shift.  Her works changed in almost every way.  For instance, while she had once worked mainly in paints, there was now a shift to incorporate objects and collage like effects into her works.  These collages often featured things such as pictures of extinct animals and Mary’s own PET scans, giving a very strong relation to her own future.

Personally, I feel that while the earlier part of her works were more visually appealing, her later works left me with a deeper message and stronger connection.  Several of these works had a very powerful messege for me, and the relation to the passage of time and the death of everything was interesting in that it was both accepted and defied at the same time.  Perhaps the strongest example of this is the work “Waiting for the Miracle.”  Hambleton clearly showed the passage of time with thin horizontal lines, going through repeated circles that could represent the turns of the Earth.  The top was lined with blocks, showing pictures like the dodo bird, an extinct species of elephant, and Mary’s own PET scans.  These factors scream “Life ends” but there is the image of a hand holding an egg on one of the blocks, which whispers back “but it begins again.”  Several of Hambleton’s works seem to deal with the issue of death and time, but this was the only one featured that also showed a slightly positive outlook.  As Mary passed away within a year of the completion of this work, perhaps that shows an acceptance of her fate?  One cannot be sure.  However, it is clear that Mary Hambleton left us with much to think about as we ponder her artwork for years to come.

Mary Hambleton and her “Hard Rain” exhibit

October 29th, 2009

Most of Mary Hambleton’s late work at the exibit seemed to have been created through a very therapeutic process.  Although most of her “cancer-specific” work included the image of her PET scan and perhaps a dodo bird or two (or three), Mary also used the ambiguity of color and shape and natural inspirations that continued the themes of her earlier work while battling cancer.

Her colorful - and in my opinion more abstract – works were almost oozing with emotion and careful thought.  The ways Mary scraped away parts of her paint, added shapes on top of each other, and adhered 3-D objects around the wood block or canvas impressed upon me that art served the same effect for Mary as does journaling for others.  Tiffany Bell mentions that Mary took time to create her works and had begun crafting Quech (my favorite) and Query long before she confronted cancer.  Although she began these works before her relationship with cancer began, Mary finished and titled them between 2002-2004, and so they have been included as part of this exhibit.  I liked how the curator included these works because it represents a link between Mary’s past and present life in the context of her cancer timeline.  The pattern of her work demonstrated that color and natural shapes were very important to her, and her abstract style held great potential for serving as an outlet for human thought – both her own and her viewers.

On the other hand, the PET scan-esque pieces that were contained within game boards of extinct animals (over and over again), or by themselves were not my favorite.  Of course, I realize that she must have been very contemplative about her life and the possibility of death — which no doubt led her to consider her own demise against the demise of other species.  There was something very uncanny about seeing an x-ray-type image of a human, which serves the specific purpose of clarifying the agent of death: cancer.  I can only imagine that Mary was mystified by the deep symbolism her scan represented and saw it as the potential to remind her viewers of the reality of death as part of the circle of life.  At the same time, caner did not become the soul focus of her work, as Tiffany Bell’s article attests to.  Even while knowing of Mary’s story, most of her work encourages the viewer to create her own interpretations out of the ambiguity of color, shape, pain, and humanity evident in her works.

Like Yu mentioned in class, I would have liked to see more of her work before her diagnosis – just out of curiosity.  Bell mentions how Hambleton wanted to “endow her work with spiritual or mystical content.”  In reading the article about Mary, I get the feeling that her projects aroused affects similar to those of “Hard Rain” even before her cancer-imbued work began.  Bell also mentions Mary’s fondness of incorporating natural materials into her work, as well as creating nature-inspired images and forms.  The ambiguity inherent to her pieces correspond to the mystic reality of nature when one takes the time to consider it closely. 

In terms of nature, art, and technology, I witnessed yet another perspective of this topic in Mary Hambleton on Tuesday.  She incorporates the shapes and contemplations of nature/humanity into either canvassed wood blocks or digitalized, abstracted compilations of her own PET scans.  Mary allows us to consider the picture of our own mortality that would not exist if it were not for technology.  She also encourages her viewer to find the piece beneath the technology, which exists in the careful thought that composes her art.

Hard Rain and Mary Hambleton

October 29th, 2009

If someone had walked up to me on Monday and asked me if I enjoyed abstract art in general, my answer would have been “No,” and after viewing Hambleton exhibit, my answer is still no. I general do not connect to very abstract pieces on an emotional or aesthetic level. However, this does not mean that I cannot see the merit in such pieces. When I initially viewed the exhibit, the only thing I knew about the artist or the exhibit was that the artist had cancer when she made many of the pieces, and that one painting was named after a Bob Dylan song. I am glad that I chose to view them with little background at first, because it allowed me to see them though solely my eyes and form my own first impressions.

 

My general reaction to the exhibit, after I had seen them all once, was, “These are very ambiguous, and many are just plain confusing.” The only painting I liked for purely aesthetic reasons was Quench; it was the only one I would consider putting in my house (if I had a house). I don’t know why this is—perhaps it is simply my affection for the color blue. Although, my general feeling for the exhibit was confusion, there were a few pieces that I thought were relatively unambiguous. Enough was simple—enough. Anger and frustration almost oozed from the work. This is perhaps the only piece that has a seemingly clear message from just looking at the piece and knowing the title. The rest of the exhibit was much more ambiguous to me. Yes, the use of the PET scans and extinct animals certainly transmits a certain feel to the pieces they are included in, but there is far from a set interpretation. Do these mean fear, regret, and a sense of similarity; are they supposed to evoke sympathy? While I do not know about the first few, I do not think that these paintings were meant to pull sympathy. I just do not get that feeling from them. It seems more to me like, “This is how I feel right now, these are things that have occupied my mind recently, and this is what those thought look like.” However, this is just my opinion.

 

After I viewed the whole exhibit I sat and read the essay by Bell. This essay did allow me to look at certain pieces in a new light. The greatest change for me came from Waiting for the Miracle. I had originally passed this one without much thought. However, going back and seeing the apparent movement in the middle, and the progression on top, I did get a much better sense of the waiting and how painful that could be.

There were a few things that I did not quite understand in Bell. First, what seems like (to me, again just my interpretation) an implication that anything related to games, bright color, or blocks was playful or hopeful. While I understand that in the context of these works, these things may indeed represent optimistic and hopeful things, it irks me that it seems as though just because Hambleton began using these certain elements that means she had begun to be more optimistic. I have seen the use of games and bright “happy” colors to transmit pain or confusion or any other emotion commonly portrayed as negative. Even more relevant, the genre of abstract art is so ambiguous and subject to interpretation that any such assertions are going to seem very restrictive. Second—and this is a much smaller matter—was the assertion that Hard Rain was less subtle than the other works of Hambleton. I now know a significant amount the piece and the artist and it is still subtle and up for interpretation for me. This is probably just an argument in semantics—what do I consider subtle and what does Bell consider subtle—but I thought it was worth a mention.

Hard Rain: Late Works of Mary Hambleton

October 27th, 2009

The exhibit, Hard Rain: Late Works of Mary Hambleton, was works of art that Mary created that reflected life during cancer. All of her pieces were aesthetically pleasing. They had good flow, unity through common colors, and strong geometric shapes. After viewing the pieces closely I could tell how much time and effort was put into them. The shire complexity of the works was astounding. You could actually see all the layers placed on top of one another. I stood staring at one of the works trying to figure out how she made the lines look sunken in and then realized that she either carved away some of the paint or put multiple layers on the outer edges to create that depth. I was awed at how much she was able to get done while fighting her cancer. A few of her pieces I was drawn more to than others.

 

The first one that caught my eye went by the name Untitled. This piece had a black background and had curved lines in the middle. At the top of the page appeared to be a moon. In the upper right, lower right, and left middle were bright red dots. Now, from far away the only interesting thing was the high contrast between the bright red dots, off white lines, and pitch-black background. However, when you move in closer and tilt your head to the right, the white curved lines form the shape of a dove midflight. This piece could mean/represent multiple things, but one sticks out the most in my mind. I think that this represents how if we just look at things for face value it will be aesthetically pleasing, but when we look closer we see something completely different. At first the curvy lines exhibit playfulness and happiness, but underneath it is the dove. To me the dove in flight shows that she is on the way to peace, accepting what is happening. She is wearing a mask to show that all is well, but if you look closely, then you see that it is a lie. She is working hard to get to that point, but was not there.

 

The other piece that caught my eye was Offering Red that was made in 2004. This one looks like a present with a strip of heavily textured wood to the right. The “present” has a maroon/red paint job with 4 thin, navy blue lines that go vertically down it. The “bow” is a pile of little blocks that are a vibrant red. The textured part to the right is black with green and yellow dry brushing over it. I see this piece as saying: with good things, bad things are close behind. The “present” is a gift, a good thing and the textured part is bad because it is distorted, hiding/not showing its true self. In addition, the green dry brushing is contrasting strongly to the red gift. The contrast means that there is a conflict between the two and the greatest conflict known is good vs. bad. I see the black texture as after the gift because we read left to right, thus we look at objects the same way. So, due to the design of the painting it is the last thing we see.

 

Overall, all of Mary Hambleton’s works make me think on a deeper level because I want to know what the meaning behind it is. Knowing that she did these pieces when she had cancer has made me think along the lines of being near death.

 

Questions:

            Does she work with geometric shapes due to her pieces having so much meaning, causing more contrast? (simple vs. deep and complex vs. shallow)

            What does the “bow” from Offering Red mean, if it means anything at all?

            Did she favor dark colors because she was going through a dark time in her life or because they were her favorite colors and she wanted to cheer herself up?

 

Mary Hambleton’s Late Works

October 27th, 2009

Thanks to the background information we were provided, I felt a connection to the abstract strokes and ambiguous themes of Mary Hambleton’s late works. Having watched my mom fight breast cancer, I felt a particularly strong connection to the work “Enough.” Furthermore, I found the exhibit left me with some lasting and powerful impressions.

Several elements of the work spoke to me. The first thing that jumped out to me when I first saw “Enough” was the layers upon layers of paint that resulted in the coral-like, 3-D texture of the majority of the work. This was distinctive among the rest of Hambleton’s late works and, to me, spoke to the rawness of the emotions that the artist was trying to convey. While most of her works incorporated layers, “Enough” was the only one featured that included textures that were not flat and parallel to one another. The irregularity of the structures gave me a sense of loss of control, which perhaps is what Hambleton felt in her last years struggling with cancer. Furthermore, the structures and colors added atop the irregular, raised layers of black paint inspired images of pain and struggle.

Protruding from the black were seemingly sharp objects, shards that were reminiscent of being stabbed and injured. Beyond the shards were, most disturbingly, rusted nails. Finally, hazards of color were splashed over the black structures, which to me symbolized a desperate attempt to achieve or maintain the same order and joy prominent in the bordering regions of the work. Together, these elements communicated to me a sense of struggle—a fight to maintain a philosophy and a perception of life while undergoing pain and abuse. The reading by Tiffany Bell suggests that this work could be addressing Hambleton’s frustration at the countless operations and procedures she must have undergone in attempt to regain and preserve her health. Examining the work inspired in me feelings of pain and frustration, and having analyzed these different elements in the piece I would have to agree with Bell’s assessment of its meaning.

Leaving the exhibit, I found myself endowed with two lasting impressions. The first of these was a greater appreciation for the power of art, and more particularly abstract art. Before today, if someone had asked me if I was a fan of abstract art, I probably would have said that I did not understand it, and that perhaps it was less valuable because its interpretation is so subjective. However, being exposed to Hambleton’s works today made me realize that understanding just a little bit of an artist’s life can enable you to understand and appreciate the profound nature of his work. Moreover, having seen the works in the gallery today, I would be more likely to submit to the possibility that in some cases, abstract art can be more powerful for its ambiguity than can other more straightforward works.

The second impression I left with today was of a more personal nature. Leaving the gallery, I found I had a greater awareness, or had been reminded, of what my mom must have gone through when she had cancer. I was only nine when she was diagnosed, and as a kid I could not fully understand what cancer meant. More importantly, the thought never crossed my mind that she could die from the disease. Touring relics of a real person’s life who died from cancer, I found myself with a new appreciation of how lucky my mom was and how lucky I am that she is still here. The fact that Hambleton’s work inspired in me such a personal realization further speaks to the power of abstract art. While other forms of art may limit audiences’ interpretation of a piece, I feel that abstract art may provide a greater opportunity for sympathy. The high level of ambiguity found in abstract art may allow viewers to place themselves, their experiences, in the context of the work and therefore to gain more personal insight. This further reminds me of the discussion we had last week about the narcissism of the artist. While the experience of creating her artworks may have functioned to help Hambleton cope with her struggle, the abstract and ambiguous nature of the product makes the work less narcissistic and more humanistic. 

Mary Hambleton Exhibit Response

October 27th, 2009

Art can be inspired by a myriad of situations and experiences, which is especially evident in the works of Mary Hambleton.  After viewing her exhibit, Hard Rain, I could honestly feel the struggle, the optimism, the despair, the hope, and the lack thereof permeating through her artworks.  Personally, I believe that reading about Hambleton’s background before viewing her exhibit helped me to have a better understanding of what her work symbolizes.  Had I not been informed beforehand that Hambleton fought against melanoma during the time that much of her work was created, I might have only interpreted her paintings to be random bright lines and somewhat creepy PET scans bordered by extinct birds.  However, with prior knowledge of her circumstances, her artwork took on a whole new depth of meaning and significance. 

The piece which immediately struck me and drew me into it was “Waiting for a Miracle.”  Although not as brightly painted as some of the other works, the soft grays and whites were a contrast in their setting.  I could see faint outlines of circles passing along the long stretch of canvas, to me creating a shape of a moon passing through its entire cycle.  Essentially, I saw this to be a quick passage of time - one that seems to slip through your very fingers like millions of tiny grains of sand.  For Hambleton, I interpretted this to be the rapid passage of time after her diagnosis, when everything seemed to speed up and “typical” daily life became completely altered.  The title of the piece is also laced with sadness in that as more and more time passes, the likelihood of a miracle happening – her cancer being cured – becomes less and less. 

I was honestly very bothered by Hambleton’s “Enough.”  Upon seeing it, I felt confronted with feelings of frustration, anger, and torment.  While her other pieces incorporate vertical parallel lines of alternating shades of colors, this one encompassed blobs of rough paint mounds punctured by nails and shards.  It has an aggressive tone that is immediately communicated, also translating Hambleton’s personal struggle in dealing with the acceptance and treatment of her cancer.  As I continued to look at it, I found it strangely grotesque and depressing that someone had to undergo such a stressful and trying situation, yet could still express that struggle in art form.

In direct contrast to “Enough,” I perceived “Lucky” to be quite optimistic, perhaps during a period where Hambleton’s hopes were high and she had faith that she would be able to defeat the melanoma before the melanoma defeated her.  Unlike many of her other pieces, “Lucky” incorporated much warmer and earthier colors into its color scheme.  There were oranges, yellows, greens, and browns – each seemingly giving off a sense of warmth and security that can be derived from nature.  I discovered that several of her other artworks had colors that appeared artificial – shocking pinks, neon blues, and electric yellows – and projected a feeling of happiness Hambleton wished she had.  Yet with “Lucky,” the colors seemed natural and to flow wholeheartedly across the canvas which, to me, appeared much more authentic and honest as a reflection of her present emotional and mental state. 

Finally, the piece “Hard Rain” (for which the exhibit was named after), caught my attention and made me think deeply about Hambleton’s phsycial plight.  Topped with a square picture of one of her PET scans, the painting continues down on a larger square canvas where streaks of off-white paint are seen connecting the two shapes – almost as if painted on accident.  However, when taking the title into consideration, those streaks became raindrops in my mind, and then eventually tears.  I felt that this piece best emphasized the strenght it takes to face something of such magnitude as battling cancer, while also humanizing her work.  No one can be strong all of the time.  For that reason, I interpretted to PET scan (a representation of herself) to be connected by rain and tears to her “hard” fight.

Blue Morph

October 26th, 2009

Here are some links related to the Victoria Vesna | Jim Gimzewski project Blue Morph:

Thanks to Ashley, who found the link I showed parts of in class:
http://www.sr.se/p1/SRc/bluemorph/index.html

Project website:  http://artsci.ucla.edu/BlueMorph/concept.html

Victoria Vesna’s website:  http://vv.arts.ucla.edu/

Studio 360 radio show presentation on the project: http://www.studio360.org/episodes/2007/12/07/segments/89690

Links to video material on YouTube

A Few Miyazaki Trailers

October 22nd, 2009

Spirited Away: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h2BM6ACeiVs

Princess Mononoke: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pkWWWKKA8jY

Ponyo: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5BfNtYF94cQ